<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>The Expert of Experts</title>
        <link>http://expertofexperts.com/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:40:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Pennsylvania Courts On Medical Experts </title>
            <description><![CDATA[The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court recently ruled that in workers' 
compensation cases, an expert's opinion could be held valid even if the 
expert did not personally examine a specific injury the worker suffered.
 In Stancell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, the court affirmed a
 benefits termination petition after the employer's medical expert 
testified regarding the employee's ability to return to work.<br /><br />The court's holding suggests that as long as testifying physicians have 
sufficient, credible information regarding a worker's recovery, findings
 on a specific injury (especially when multiple injuries are the basis 
for benefits) may not be necessary to support the physician's opinion. <br /><br />Read more: <a href="http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/index.php">24-7pressrelease.com</a>.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/07/pennsylvania-courts-on-medical.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/07/pennsylvania-courts-on-medical.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Medical</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:40:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Petroleum Engineering Expert On BP Test</title>
            <description><![CDATA[BP 
engineers began a critical test of their leaking Gulf of  Mexico oil 
well on Wednesday evening in an effort to determine if the pipes were 
structurally sound enough to allow them to seal off the gushing crude.&nbsp; The test will measure the pressure 
inside the well. High-pressure readings for at least 48 hours may 
suggest that the well casings are relatively undamaged, which could mean
 it is safe to leave the well capped from above. And that, of course, 
would mean the incessant gush of oil, which has already despoiled 
ecosystems, livelihoods and lives, may finally stop, perhaps by the end 
of the week. <br /><br /><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal" align="justify">But the test itself is risky business.
 It requires that the well be sealed off temporarily with a snug, 
specially constructed capping stack that was latched onto the top of the
 well on Monday. And much like a thumb in a hole-studded garden hose, 
the cap could push oil out of any cracks that might exist in the well.</p><div align="justify">  </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal" align="justify">That scenario, in turn, could cause 
oil to seep upward and begin gushing from the sea bed, potentially 
turning the well into a ragged crater.&nbsp; “That is
 THE worst case scenario,” said Iraj Ershaghi, a petroleum engineering 
expert at the University of Southern California. “Nobody has the 
technology to handle that.”</p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Read more: <a href="http://businessmirror.com.ph/index.php">BusinessMirror.com</a>.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><br /></p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/07/petroleum-engineering-expert-o.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/07/petroleum-engineering-expert-o.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Energy</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Taser Experts On Weapons Risk</title>
            <description><![CDATA[A public inquiry report that concluded a Taser jolt carries a small 
risk of death is entirely supported by the evidence and is actually 
confirmed by the "fine print" the company now attaches to its weapons, 
the British Columbia government argued Tuesday as it defended the inquiry's findings
 in court. Taser International is challenging the first report into 
the death of Robert Dziekanski, arguing commissioner Thomas Braidwood 
treated the company unfairly and then reached conclusions that weren't 
supported by the facts.&nbsp; <br /><br />The Taser International's co-founder and several of its own experts appeared before the 
hearings in 2008.&nbsp; But a lawyer for B.C.'s attorney general told a judge Tuesday 
the conclusion that a shock from a Taser has the capacity to affect the 
heart is confirmed by a training bulletin issued by the company last 
September — two months after the report's release.&nbsp; The document, which received wide media coverage and 
prompted police forces across Canada to adjust their policies, 
recommended the devices be aimed away from the heart to "avoid the 
remote potential risk of cardiac effect."<br /><br />Read more: <a href="http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/">http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/</a><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/07/taser-experts-on-weapons.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/07/taser-experts-on-weapons.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accident Safety &amp; Reconstruction</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Medical Expert Testifies In Child Endangerment Case</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The defense brought their first medical expert to 
the stand on Tuesday in the trial of Paul Hill.&nbsp; Hill is the Sioux City man charged with child 
endangerment resulting in the death of his 4-month-old daughter Tryniti 
Hill.&nbsp; The defense called forensic neuropathology expert Dr. Jan who described the differences in the several 
hemorrhages found by medical examiners in Tryniti's brain during her 
autopsy.<br /><br /><p orgfontsize="12px">When a hemorrhage occurs in the brain, Leestma 
says, "scavenger cells" take over to try and clean it up.&nbsp; Leetsma says its difficult to say how long each 
have been there.&nbsp; "Those cells can be present for years or longer 
they seem to get trapped there and that's the end," says Dr. Jan 
Leestma, forensic neuropathology consultant.&nbsp; Leestma also says many people both adults and 
children, don't know they have hemorrhages right away.</p><p orgfontsize="12px">For more, see <a href="http://www.ktiv.com/Global/category.asp?C=123694&amp;nav=menu1474_1">ktv.com</a>.<br /></p><p orgfontsize="12px"><br /></p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/07/medical-expert-testifies-in-ch.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/07/medical-expert-testifies-in-ch.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Medical</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Finance Expert On Nacchio Insider Trading</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span id="redesign_default"><p>Finance professor Anjan Thakor testified 
as an expert witness for the government Tuesday in the resentencing of 
former Qwest chief executive Joe Nacchio, who is serving a six-year 
prison term for illegal insider trading.</p> 
<p>Thakor said Nacchio illegally gained as much as $32.9 million from 
the insider stock sales for which he was convicted in 2007, according to
 court documents. The gain amount — the portion of the proceeds that can
 be attributed to the nonpublic information Nacchio based his stock 
sales on — is a key sentencing factor.</p></span>Read more: <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/">denverpost.com</a>.<br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/finance-expert-on-nacchio-insi.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/finance-expert-on-nacchio-insi.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Business, Finance, &amp; Economics</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Construction Expert On Las Vegas CityCenter Dispute</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Perini Building Co. and MGM Mirage are preparing for a court battle over
 nearly $500 million in disputed construction bills at Las Vegas CityCenter, an 
$8.5 billion project, the largest private project in U.S. 
history.&nbsp; "The claims and counterclaims in this case are immensely
 complicated and complex," said George Ogilvie, managing partner with 
McDonald Carano Wilson LLP, which represents Perini. "The court and the 
parties must be mindful of the impact of this litigation not only on 
Perini, but also on the subcontractors and suppliers whose livelihoods 
and very existence are at stake."<br /><br />MGM Mirage gains greater negotiating leverage by bypassing its general 
contractor and dealing directly with subcontractors, industry observers 
said.&nbsp; "It enables MGM to beat down smaller-sized, cash-strapped 
companies and pay pennies on the dollar," said one construction expert 
who requested anonymity. "The option is to face endless and costly 
litigation, with no promise of additional compensation in the future. 
Unfortunately, this 'divide-and-conquer' approach has become a common 
close-out model on large-sized projects."<br /><br />For more, see <a href="http://www.lvbusinesspress.com/">lasvegasbusinesspress.</a><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/construction-expert-on-las-veg.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/construction-expert-on-las-veg.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Construction</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Accidents and Safety Experts On Traffic Injuries Part 3</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) designated 
May 24-June 6, 2010, Click it or Ticket (CIOT) Mobilization 
Week.&nbsp; According to a James Madison University study, one out of every 
five 
drivers will be involved in a traffic crash this year. Safety belts, 
when used properly, reduce the number of serious traffic injuries by 50 
percent and fatalities by 60-70 percent.  CURE Auto Insurance reminds 
drivers to drive safe, always wear a seat belt, and provides the 
following statistics to consider before getting behind the wheel.<br /><br /><p>
• If 90 percent of Americans buckle up, more than 5,500 deaths and 
132,000 injuries annually can be prevented (source: car-accidents.com).</p><p>
• For maximum protection, safety belts should be fastened before 
traveling any distance or speed. Seventy-five percent of crash deaths 
and injuries occur within 25 miles of home. More than half of all 
injury-producing motor vehicle crashes involve low speeds under 40 
m.p.h. (source: James Madison University).<br /></p>Citizens
 United Reciprocal Exchange, <a href="http://www.cure.com/">(CURE)</a> 
is a not-for-profit 
reciprocal exchange headquartered in Princeton, N.J. Founded in 1990 by 
New Jersey Insurance Commissioner James J. Sheeran and award-winning 
insurance expert, Dr. Lena Chang. ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/accidents-and-safety-experts-o-1.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/accidents-and-safety-experts-o-1.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accident Safety &amp; Reconstruction</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:16:24 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Accidents and Safety Experts On Traffic Injuries Part 2</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) designated 
May 24-June 6, 2010, Click it or Ticket (CIOT) Mobilization 
Week.&nbsp; According to a James Madison University study, one out of every 
five 
drivers will be involved in a traffic crash this year. Safety belts, 
when used properly, reduce the number of serious traffic injuries by 50 
percent and fatalities by 60-70 percent.  CURE Auto Insurance reminds 
drivers to drive safe, always wear a seatbelt, and provides the 
following statistics to consider before getting behind the wheel.<br /><br /><p>
• Adults who don't buckle up are sending children a deadly message that 
it is alright not to wear a seat belt. Children model adult behavior. 
Research shows that if a driver is unbuckled, 70 percent of the time 
children riding in that vehicle won't be buckled either (source: NHTSA).</p><p>
• Despite terrible traffic problems such as aggressive driving, 
increasing seat belt use is still the single most effective thing we can
 do to save lives and reduce injuries on Americas roadways (source: 
NHTSA). Sixty-three percent of people killed in car accidents were not 
wearing seatbelts (car-accidents.com).<br /></p><br /><p>Citizens
 United Reciprocal Exchange, <a href="http://www.cure.com/">(CURE)</a> 
is a not-for-profit 
reciprocal exchange headquartered in Princeton, N.J. Founded in 1990 by 
New Jersey Insurance Commissioner James J. Sheeran and award-winning 
insurance expert, Dr. Lena Chang.</p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/the-national-highway-traffic-s.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/the-national-highway-traffic-s.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accident Safety &amp; Reconstruction</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Accidents and Safety Experts On Traffic Injuries Part 1</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) designated May 24-June 6, 2010, Click it or Ticket (CIOT) Mobilization 
Week.&nbsp; According to a James Madison University study, one out of every five 
drivers will be involved in a traffic crash this year. Safety belts, 
when used properly, reduce the number of serious traffic injuries by 50 
percent and fatalities by 60-70 percent.  CURE Auto Insurance reminds 
drivers to drive safe, always wear a seatbelt, and provides the 
following statistics to consider before getting behind the wheel.<br /><br /><p>
• Failure to buckle up contributes to more fatalities than any other 
single traffic safety-related behavior. Every hour someone dies in 
America simply because they didn't buckle up (source: NHTSA). </p><p>
• Safety belt use is one of the best defenses against the unpredictable 
actions of drunk drivers (source: James Madison University).</p><p>Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange, <a href="http://www.cure.com/">(CURE)</a> is a not-for-profit 
reciprocal exchange headquartered in Princeton, N.J. Founded in 1990 by 
New Jersey Insurance Commissioner James J. Sheeran and award-winning 
insurance expert, Dr. Lena Chang.</p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/accidents-and-safety-experts-o.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/06/accidents-and-safety-experts-o.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accident Safety &amp; Reconstruction</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Engineering Expert &amp; &quot;Top Kill&quot; Operation</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Eight hours into the Gulf of Mexico oil spill "top kill" operation, a BP official said Wednesday 
night that it was too soon to tell if it would work. BP Chief Operating 
Officer Doug Suttles said he expected to know if the plan was working 
within 24 hours. “Top kill,” which has been described as one of the most elaborately 
staged and far-reaching maneuvers to stop oil from gushing into the Gulf
 of Mexico, was put into action at 2 p.m. Eastern time.<br /><br />Engineering expert Manhar Dhanak of the Institute for Ocean and Systems Engineering in 
Boca Raton, Fla., was concerned about the state of the blowout 
preventer. If it is damaged, the rate of oil could greatly increase. “Rather
 than helping, it could create more problems,” Mr. Dhanak says. <br /><br />For more, see <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/">csmonitor.com</a>.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/05/engineering-expert-top-kill-op.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/05/engineering-expert-top-kill-op.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Environmental</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 11:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Fire Cause and Origin Expert On Incendiary Fire</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Susan Lukjan is the St. Matthews, KY, business owner accused of burning down her 
own business allegedly to collect the insurance money.&nbsp; On Thursday, her defense attorney, Thomas Clay, challenged Major Henry Ott's ruling of incendiary fire, meaning the fire was intentionally set, and said there was no 
accelerant found.&nbsp; The fire cause and origin expert witness is with the Louisville Fire Department's arson unit.&nbsp; <br /><br />Clay accused Ott of "expectation bias" in relation 
to his client's motives to start the fire, meaning he formed his opinion before all the evidence came in.<br /><br />Read more: <a href="http://www.wlky.com/index.html">wlky.com</a>.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/05/fire-cause-and-origin-expert-o.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/05/fire-cause-and-origin-expert-o.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Fire</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 06:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Accident Reconstruction Expert Testiifes In Reckless Homicide Case</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Accident reconstruction expert Bruce Enz testified for the prosecution in the Greene 
County trial of Jeff Adams saying his investigation indicated Jerry Marker was 
going the speed limit, 40 mph, when his motorcycle was hit by Preston 
Williams' black Camaro in a "dead-on, head-on" crash on May 9, 2009. Enz's experience spans 32 years in the field of accident reconstruction 
and investigation.&nbsp; Enz said, by his determination, the calculated speed of the Camaro was 
within a range of 75-80 mph at the time of impact.<br /><br />Adams is on trial for two counts of aiding in reckless homicide, 
criminal recklessness with a deadly weapon and reckless driving. He is 
accused of driving a Toyota Supra on State Road 54 on May 9, 2009, and 
racing with Preston Williams who was driving a black Camaro with Jessica
 Allman on board.<br /><br />For more, see <a href="http://gcdailyworld.com/">gcdailyworld</a>.&nbsp; <br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/05/accident-reconstruction-expert-5.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/05/accident-reconstruction-expert-5.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accident Safety &amp; Reconstruction</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 06:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Medical Expert Testimony Does Not Require Physical Exam</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="storyheadline">
          In <i>Doctor's testimony on full recovery doesn't require physical 
exam</i>, Risk &amp; Insurance.com writes:         </div>
         <blockquote><p align="left">
        <!-- Lead -->
     <span class="contentTypeBold">In Pennsylvania, a medical 
expert's opinion that a worker has fully recovered can be based on 
sufficient evidence even if the expert has not personally physical 
examined the worker. </span>
     <br />
     </p><p align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Case name: </b><i>Stancell v. 
Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (LKI Group, LLC)</i>, No. 1901 C.D. 
2009 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 03/10/10).</font>
</p><p align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Ruling: </b>The Pennsylvania 
Commonwealth Court affirmed the grant of the employer's termination 
petition. </font><br /></p></blockquote><blockquote><div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><b>What it means:</b> In Pennsylvania, an 
employer seeking to terminate benefits has the burden of presenting 
competent medical testimony that the worker has fully recovered. A 
medical expert's opinion that a worker has fully recovered can be based 
on sufficient evidence even if the expert has not personally physical 
examined the worker.</font><br /><br />For more, see <a href="http://www.riskandinsurance.com/index.jsp">risk&amp;insurance.com</a>.<br /></div></blockquote><blockquote><div align="left"><br /><br /></div></blockquote><p>
</p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/05/medical-expert-testimony-does.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/05/medical-expert-testimony-does.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Medical</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:15:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Seventh Circuit On Expert Opinions</title>
            <description><![CDATA[In<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: normal;"> <i>Seventh Circuit Requires Full Daubert Hearing and
Ruling Before District Court Rules on Class Certification</i>, Michael Blankshain writes:<br /></span><blockquote><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: normal;"><o:p></o:p></span>

In <em>American
 Honda Motor Co. v. Allen</em>, the Seventh Circuit Court of 
Appeals held that when an expert’s opinion is critical to class 
certification, a district court must conclusively rule on any challenge 
to the expert’s qualifications or submissions, performing a full Daubert
 analysis if necessary, before ruling on a class certification motion. <em></em>American Honda is the latest in a series of
 Seventh Circuit cases to emphasize the rigorous fact, and often 
merit-based analysis district courts must undertake before ruling on a 
class certification motion. It is also consistent with, and expands 
upon, the developing law in other circuits. See,<em> e.g., In re 
Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig.</em>, 553 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2008) 
(vacating order granting class certification where district court did 
not adequately consider expert opinions).<br /></blockquote>For more, see <a href="http://www.wildman.com/bulletin/041410/">wildman.com</a>.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/04/seventh-circuit-on-expert-opin.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/04/seventh-circuit-on-expert-opin.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Engineering</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:32:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Accident Investigation Expert Testifies In Fatal DUI</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="News">Accident investigation expert Jason Kloese testified Thursday that Edward Cook was driving at least 49 mph in a 30 mph zone
 last year when he went off a residential street in Batavia,IL, killing a 
man and his dog.&nbsp; Kloese estimated Cook's speed between 49.9 mph and 56.4 mph in the July
 29, 2009, crash that killed 57-year-old David Long of Batavia and his 
black lab mix, Shadow. He said there were no signs of mechanical 
problems on the car Cook was driving, nor other circumstances that would
 have caused him to drive onto the sidewalk and hit Long. <br /></p><p class="News">Cook, who was on parole for a prior DUI conviction at the time of the 
crash, told police he "blanked out" at the wheel after a night of 
drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana. He denied having stolen a 2003 
white Acura from a friend's girlfriend earlier that morning. <br /></p><p class="News">For more, see <a href="http://www.dailyherald.com/">dailyherald.com</a>.<br /></p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/04/accident-investigation-expert.html</link>
            <guid>http://expertofexperts.com/2010/04/accident-investigation-expert.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accident Safety &amp; Reconstruction</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:25:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
