Researching The Expert: February 2009 Archives

Experts On National Academy of Sciences Report

| | TrackBacks (0)

In Report questions science, reliability of crime lab evidence, LATimes.com writes:

The National Academy of Sciences says many courtroom claims about fingerprints, bite marks and other evidence lack scientific verification. It finds forensics inconsistent and in disarray nationwide. 

The National Academy of Sciences report called for a wholesale overhaul of the crime lab system, which has become increasingly crucial to American jurisprudence.  Many experts said the report could have a broad impact on crime labs and the courts, ushering in changes at least as significant as those generated by the advent of DNA evidence two decades ago.
Recommendations from the scientific panel included requiring that expert witnesses and forensic analysts be certified by the new agency, and that labs be accredited. 

Blogroll

Blogs We’re Watching

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Researching The Expert category from February 2009.

Researching The Expert: January 2009 is the previous archive.

Researching The Expert: May 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.