However the court considered all he facts and concluded that the state’s obligation to Martin was to make the conditions of performing an inherently risky maneuver like rail sliding “as safe as they appear to be, not as safe as it could be.” In other words the person executing the maneuver had to take some responsibility for their actions, make their own decision about how they would behave and accept some of the consequences.
Excerpted from PlanetSKI.com.
