Understand that our judicial system holds that a physician in the same field as the defendant is the most qualified to determine whether the defendant met the standard of care. Standard of care is what is reasonably expected of a physician in that field given the circumstances. So if the defendant is a hospitalist, the attorneys are looking for an expert witness who is also a hospitalist. Seems like a reasonable system, right? Individuals are judged by their peers. But the system is far from perfect.
Critics point out the system is inherently flawed when we rely on “experts” to help us determine the standard of care. Aside from working in a given field of medicine, there are no specific qualifications to be an expert witness. Unfortunately, not all experts are experts, and not all experts are completely honest. And there can be a lot of money at stake. Plaintiffs attorneys and defense attorneys, along with expert witnesses for both sides, stand to profit from lawsuits. All of this drives up the cost of medical malpractice premiums.
Understanding The Responsibility of Becoming A Medical Expert Witness Part 2
In Think Twice Before Accepting An Expert Witness Offer, Hospitalist.com writes:
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Understanding The Responsibility of Becoming A Medical Expert Witness Part 2.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://expertofexperts.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/245

Leave a comment