Experts Ruled Out Of $615M Poultry Case

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Judge Gregory K. Frizzell has ruled that the two expert witnesses who would have testified that bacterial loads in the Illinois Watershed are due to field application of poultry litter and other poultry waste will not be permitted to testify.  Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson has sued seven poultry companies with headquarters and/or operations in Arkansas for contamination of the rivers and streams in the watershed. In a ruling last month, Judge Frizzell said Edmondson, should he prevail, could not seek the $615 million in monetary damages he sought to collect. 

Frizzell said the two witnesses -- Valerie Harwood, a microbiology expert at the University of South Florida, and Roger Olsen, an independent chemistry expert based in Denver, CO, based their conclusions on research methods that have never passed rigorous peer review and that Olsen's conclusions were subjective.  An Edmondson spokesperson said the attorney general's office is disappointed in the ruling but said Harwood's and Olsen's testimony is not essential to the case, which "remains intact and strong."

Excerpted from FeedStuffs.com.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Experts Ruled Out Of $615M Poultry Case.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://expertofexperts.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/240

Leave a comment