A 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. suggested judges look closely at the scientific evidence of expert witnesses that is meant for juries and encouraged judges to consider whether the work was published in scientific journals and subjected to peer scrutiny.
Harwood and Olsen testified they tracked fecal
bacteria and chemical components of poultry litter as it moved from
poultry farms to streams. Witnesses who testified for the poultry
companies said they doubted the researchers could track litter or its
components accurately.
Excerpted from NWAnews.com.

Leave a comment