A Peabody
District Court judge later set aside the verdict and granted Merry a new trial
due to new evidence. The prosecutor used a statement from a state
police reconstruction expert concerning a crack in the windshield as evidence during
his closing argument. Merry’s lawyers
argue that the evidence had not been discussed during the trial and that prosecutors
intentionally withheld the statement.
For more, see TheSalemNewsOnline.

Leave a comment